Alara still hates Tumblr

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

You know, I’m very pleased we’re finally getting queer representation in TV and movies and comics, but you know what I truly, thoroughly despise about it is that now everyone is a rabid hysterical shipper who thinks the world is ending when their ship isn’t canon.

For most of the history of fanfiction, no queer ship was ever canon. So queer ships were delightfully free of the obnoxious ship wars you’d get where het shippers of two different ships would demonize the other half of the other pairing, annoy content creators, and generally make asses of themselves. Now that some queer ships are canon, people go into absolute hysterics when their favorite character does not make kissyface in canon with the person they want to ship them with.

Me, I’m done with shipping pairs. I want everything to be an OT3 or a polycule, because those definitely won’t be canon.

theconcealedweapon

Anonymous asked:

Everyone posting on #ACAB better keep up that same energy when they get assaulted, raped, robbed, or someone they know gets murdered. Black lives matter but not all cops are bad.

theconcealedweapon answered:

If not all cops are bad, then tell it to the bad cops. They think all cops are bad just like them. They do bad things in clear view of other cops and are confident that the other cops are bad also. I’ll believe that good cops exist when bad cops believe it.

And plenty of victims of those crimes found cops to be useless.

alarajrogers

I know of at least one good cop in my town.

He was investigating a ring of corruption within the police department when he was shot. His murderer was never found.

That’s what happens to good cops. That’s why all cops are bastards. Because the bad ones kill the good ones or terrorize them into keeping their heads down.

prismatic-bell
ky-hound

image

Stole this from Instagram, too funny not to share. If she doesn’t ask to see it, she doesn’t want to.

argentiaertheri

What’s the joke here? “I have a dick too haha”? Cuz uh, that’s a pretty shitty joke, and more than a bit transphobic

prismatic-bell

It’s not a joke. It’s basically “how do you like having an unsolicited dick waved in your face, dude?”

argentiaertheri

Then why say it’s your dick? I’m with you on returning the “favor” but the punchline of “you make me so hard too” is raising my hackles

(FTR I know you’re not being transphobic, it’s the joke that’s bothering me, not you. I know you’ve gotten some hate lately and I promise my only issue here is with the image/joke itself)

prismatic-bell

There’s this saying, “homophobia is the fear of a man treating you like you treat women.” So I’m kind of assuming it’s playing off that? Like “if the tables were turned....”

lubefairy

Its literally treating them the way they are treating you. Turn about is fair play. Good idea. Great meme. Gn everyone

prismatic-bell

^ this.


It’s also a bit of....okay, this isn’t a great word for it but I can’t think of a better one so go easy on me, okay? It’s a bit of a necessity if you want to get the point across. If you reply with a picture of a vagina, they’re going to assume you’re reciprocating. You have to do something they’re going to find gross, and the kind of guy who sends dick pics is the kind who’s EXTREMELY unlikely to be okay with receiving them.


Now if you’re a bit Internet-savvy, I personally approve of finding their Facebook and sending them a picture of their mom/grandma/girlfriend and being like “does she know you act like this, or should I tell her for you?” It’s amazing how fast those “hard cocks” wilt when confronted with the idea that their family might find out they’re technically committing sexual assault.

argentiaertheri

Ooooh I like that idea!

And just to clarify what I said earlier: I have no problem what so ever with replying to an unsolicited dick with an unsolicited dick. Turnabout’s fair play after all. I’m just hung up on how much this particular image reminds me of all those “hahaha you secretly hit on a man in a dress” jokes that were everywhere in the 90s

prismatic-bell

I mean, I think it definitely is a case of “your mileage may vary.” I’m not sure there is any “correct” response to this one.

alarajrogers

I feel like, rather than responding with “Thanks, you make me hard too” (which is, in fact, playing on transphobia/homophobia – it wouldn’t be effective if the guy was perfectly comfortable hitting on a trans woman with a penis or a guy pretending to be a woman online), you could respond with, “Thanks for the image! Here’s one for your collection,” like… not implying that it’s your penis, but implying that you collect penis images and assume he does too? Or “Nice, check this one out” like you think you’re just discussing penises. Or, “Oh, we’re doing that? Well, then here” like you think that the appropriate response to a penis is more penis.

I mean it’s undeniable that a penis image will probably make the kind of guy who sends dick pics uncomfortable, but you don’t want to do it in a way that fuels transphobia, and “you make me hard too”, implying that you, a presumed cis woman, have a penis, is playing on the discomfort of transphobia. A man who’s an asshole who sends unsolicited dick pics but who is comfortable with hitting on trans women wouldn’t be bothered by this; he’d take it as the reciprocation that the image of the vagina would be, as mentioned above. So send it to him but don’t imply it’s yours. Just… make him wonder what the fuck you’re doing.

Source: ky-hound
radley-writes
seashellronan

nice to see americans having fun with the word cunt, seeing a big increase of the word on here and it feels like when a child overhears someone say “fuck” and runs around the house screaming it at the top of their lungs, so cute! enjoy cunts

alarajrogers

I am really torn about this because on one hand defusing slurs is generally done by weakening them into casual conversation and on the other hand I was raised to perceive the c word as the nastiest, most misogynistic slur you can call a woman, and I can’t react to the word coming from an American as anything other that that.

Source: seashellronan
glumshoe

thejauntyfool asked:

You get to bring back one prehistoric species of your choosing, either one or resurrect the entire species, with no consequences on the environment. What do you choose?


I want a large indoor aquarium mimicking the environment of diplocaulus, and a small handful of them living in it

glumshoe answered:

When I was a kid I was weirdly fixated upon a bit character in Tamora Pierce’s Emperor Mage book—some guy named Lindhall Reed who I seem to remember being a naturalist wizard of some kind, and whose dinosaur skeleton got reanimated and turned into a pet. I think it was actually an archaeopteryx, but I imagined it as a dimorphodon, and ever since then I have wanted to be Lindhall Reed a pet pterosaur to be my companion.

I am not sure what extinct species I’d bring back, since there are so many to choose from, but if I could have one individual resurrection to be my pet I’d want a pterosaur.

(Also, now that I think about it, given the setting of the Tortall books it’s fucking wild that they had a paleontological history so much like ours. They had dragons and metal harpies and a pantheon of annoying gods, but they also had dinosaurs and an ice age with wooly mammoths.)

half-panda22

Lindhall's got a much bigger part in Tempest and Slaughter.

glumshoe

I never even heard of that one.

Was he actually cool? Like, was child-me thinking he was a real badass just projection onto the nearest naturalist with a reanimated skeleton friend?

luxpenumbra

he super was

image
image
glumshoe

“Bone!” - Lindhall Reed

alarajrogers

It’s gotta be prehistoric? Shit, I wanted to bring back the passenger pigeon.

marvelstars
bauliya

magneto's powers are sooooooo insane, like. comic book equivalent of using a bazooka to punch holes in your sheets

marvelstars

Indeed this is why writers have to add resons for why he´s holding back, because he´s always holding back if he didn´t the planet would be done and he may sometimes be or act crazy but he still wants to have a planet to live in :)

bauliya

magneto, arms huffily crossed: see i should be able to plunge any country I want into the dark age but i'm written by an english major who failed freshman physics

marvelstars

Lol indeed and the fun thing is that Magneto was seen as a weak character in the 60´s :) but to be fair Claremont did his homework when he took over the X-men title and he was like "this guy needs to be redeemed, I don´t care how many issues it takes me, this world would not opperate otherwise" but he did leave some hints here and there of how much more damage Magneto could do if he didn´t hold back by his own choice :D

alarajrogers

At one point Magneto and a copy of him with amnesia who had allied with the X-Men nearly destroyed the world having a fight at the North Pole. (To be fair it was mostly Magneto’s fault.)

The dude is ridiculously powerful. He’s flown to the moon on his own power. (Meaning he went fast enough that he could get there before needing to sleep, or else being able to maintain a force bubble that kept his oxygen in while sleeping.) He’s grabbed objects from light-years away. (This should not be possible. Magnetism only works at close range. What he is probably actually doing is carrying a magnetic field with telekinesis, but telekinesis that can reach out over light years is still insane.)

Source: bauliya
prismatic-bell
oreoambitions

Do you ever have an extremely specific gay daydream but it doesn't fit onto any of your ships so you contemplate revisiting original fiction but then you remember that the straights imposing fictional narratives over their extremely specific fantasies is how twilight happened and you have to reconsider all of your life choices

alarajrogers

No, because I recognize that the issues with Twilight had to do with the wooden nature of the main character, the Mary Sue-ification of the vampire concept, and the fact that Edward’s only character traits are “brooding” and “loves Bella”, and I realize that I am a better writer than Stephanie Meyer and I can imbue my fantasies with characters who feel three dimensional and do the things that my daydream imagines them doing but with reasons that make sense to people outside my head.

I mean. If Stephanie Meyer had been a fantastic writer and Bella was a compelling character who leapt off the page and Edward was truly interesting, then it wouldn’t have mattered that he was a stalkery asshole because the book would have been good. Twilight’s problems happened because Meyer’s very boring and conventional straight-girl-likes-bad-boys fantasy was expressed by a bad writer who didn’t know how to make the story interesting to people who don’t share that fantasy.

Source: oreoambitions
squirrelofdarkness

Anonymous asked:

But bullying usually has nothing to with marginalize identities. In my experience , people are usually bullied for obnoxious behaviors such as talking about inappropriate topics, not talking about anything but a specific topic, being loners, talking over others, being clingy, having poor hygiene or poor social skills. Nothing to do with innate characteristics or identities.

theconcealedweapon answered:

Those are innate characteristics unless you have clear rules for how to avoid them.

Also, in your experience? Does that mean you’re the one bullying them?

“How you talk to people is obnoxious. You deserve to be bullied for it. I’m not going to explain how you could fix it, but if you avoid talking to people because you get bullied every time you try, then that’s also obnoxious and you deserve to be bullied for that also.”

That’s literally what you’re saying. You’re the one who’s obnoxious.

alarajrogers

I’m sorry, but... what? Being a loner is “obnoxious behavior”? But being a bully is not?

Anon, you’re an evil person. Own it. You’re just a sad sack of evil. If you think being a loner, by definition leaving other people alone and not bothering them, is “obnoxious” behavior, then you are obviously a Mean Girl (or the male or enby equivalent thereof) who just likes mocking anyone who’s not a part of an established social group that you respect.

squirrelofdarkness

Additionally, it has everything to do with marginalized identities, especially if we're using the list anon gave. I have autism, and neurotypicals bullied me my whole childhood for having what they perceived as poor social skills. Loved getting chased across a baseball field by two older boys screaming at me that I'm a ret*rd at nine years old.

alarajrogers

Yeah, that’s the other part of this… anon’s list of traits that they think people deserve to be bullied for sound like an autism symptom list. Except for being clingy, which is also a neurodivergent symptom, just not from autism. And neurodivergence is innate. We can be educated out of those behaviors, mostly, but we don’t naturally pick them up and no one specifically teaches them.

Source: theconcealedweapon
moral-autism
misanthropiccatboy

i think when critiquing systems we should always keep in mind that privilege is the baseline. privileged people are, by and large, not being given extra - everyone else is being given less, and is very often being denied their humanity.

suffering is not a virtue and does not make one more virtuous. struggle is not the baseline of the human condition. everyone should have space to be able to live comfortably and to not be in pain. anything else is the aberration.

definitelynotplanetfall

The world does not contain a fixed amount of police brutality that merely needs to be evenly distributed.

fierceawakening

Sometimes privilege is about being given extra: getting into that good college because legacy, say.

Sometimes privilege is about being given what anyone should be given: cops assuming you’re not intending trouble until there’s evidence of this, say.

One of my biggest problems with the concept is that it makes it easy to talk about these two things as though they’re the same when they’re not.

Sometimes privilege is about entitlement. Sometimes it’s about people just not being decent to outgroups, when everyone SHOULD BE decent to everyone. That’s what decency is.

These are both unfair. They both need fixing. But the way to fix ºpeople are getting a kickback” is to close a loophole, and the way to fix ºpeople are being discriminated againstº is to demand access for all to whatever the thing is.

mindthelspace

This is… kind of why I hate the word privilege. It makes it sound like ‘privileged people’ are getting perks, when most of what the word refers to is just, basic respect and freedom that everyone ought to have. 

… And that’s not just a semantic quibble. It’s a big part of why so many people get defensive when you try to explain to them that they ‘are privileged’. Because if you’re not already familiar with the lingo, ‘you have privilege’ can hit your ears as ‘you are a lucky person living a spoiled, pampered existence, and you have never suffered’. 

And yeah, it really doesn’t help that occasionally someone will use the word ‘privilege’ to describe something that really is a perk, thereby lumping ‘sending your son to Eton’ into the same category as ‘not having to worry about being made homeless’.  

fierceawakening

Absolutely, yes. “Acknowledge that when the cops don’t murder you, it’s a privilege” is… well, it makes sense once you know the lingo, but worded just like that it’s kind of… what. I should expect to get killed? Why? They’re kind of grouchy but they’re people I see every day getting coffee too?

Worded like that it can be… such a weird thing to suddenly hear that it can make it harder to grok that what the other person is saying is, “*I am* legitimately afraid of getting killed, and that’s not something I should have to deal with. Please help me fix this problem.”

It’s not a useless concept, but it’s presented in ways that are not immediately easy to understand, and yet at the same time it’s part of the theory that if you go wtf you’re being defensive.

There’s so much that gets attributed to defensiveness that’s… actually a very predictable response to the way things are presented.

scoliosiswidowmaker

It doesn’t help that sometimes K-12 teachers in the US say things like “X is a privilege, not a right”, where X is anything from playing video games to recess to using the bathroom. Or parents telling children they’ll “lose computer privileges” for bad behavior or “TV privileges are being revoked.”

So the last time some people have heard the word is in the context of being children, and it has connotations of “You are not entitled to this thing. You should be grateful that you have it at all. I can take it away from you at any time, and in fact I am considering taking it away right now. Wanting more of it or not wanting to lose what you have is rude at best and a punishable offense at worst.”

We treat children like shit, so naturally adults will bristle at being spoken to in ways that remind them of the way they were treated as children.

alarajrogers

I’ve had this problem with it since the early 00′s when I first encountered the word. It was in the context of “black people can’t call the police when they’re in trouble; that’s a privilege white people have” and I was like… how is something that everyone should have a privilege? In natural English, privilege either means something that is given to you because you earned it (”being on the honor roll is a privilege”), with the implication that it can be taken from you when you no longer earn it, or it means something you are unfairly given (”he was born a child of privilege”). Only in the unique lingo of the left can it ever be used to mean “something everyone should have that is unfairly denied to some.”

I think we should use the term “advantage” instead. Advantage is neutral. You can have an advantage for good reasons, bad reasons, or morally neutral reasons. “Our advantage is that we understand friendship and the bad guys don’t!” “If we steal the plans we’ll have an advantage over our competitors.” “The fact that our city is on a hill gives us the advantage over our would-be invaders.”

It is a white advantage that the cops will actually show up when we call for help and usually won’t make matters worse. It is a white advantage that when we accuse someone of a crime, we are more likely to be believed if the accused is a person of color, even if our claim is ridiculous. It is a white advantage that all the band-aids match our skin color more or less. The first should be granted to everyone, the second should be granted to no one and the third should either be granted to everyone or no one (what about bandaids with artistic patterns on them? give up on matching skin color and just put Monet on a bandaid!) Calling all of these things “privilege” turns off the people who aren’t already steeped in SJ lingo, even if they’d be on our side otherwise (I have been anti-racist my whole life but when I first heard that I was privileged for being able to call the cops when I was in trouble, I was outraged, because in natural English that means I don’t deserve to be able to call the cops or that I deserve it but only because I did something special to earn it. It took a while to wrap my head around the idea that the word means something different in that context.)

“Privilege” is a word loaded with the concepts of deserving and undeserving, and never should have been used to mean “things given to the dominant class that are not permitted for the oppressed class.” We should have been using advantage all along.

Source: misanthropiccatboy